[08:56] <sebastien_st.frusquin> do we have an idea of the number of reserve squadrons that carriers and supercarriers will hold ?
[09:47] <ccp_larrikin> @sebastien_st.frusquin: nothing we've announced publicly :simple_smile:
[09:48] <ccp_larrikin> scott_ormands [9:38 PM] im going to need to find a way to clear up some more screen space <-- all the functionalty that we where using the cargo window UI for will be possible in the in-space UI too. So you won't need that open
[11:59] <steveronuken> 42. or possibly 69
[12:12] <capqu> HAHAHAHAHA LOL
[12:14] <capqu> xDDDDDDDDDD
[12:16] <steveronuken> ah, couldn't resist. bad joke, I know.
[12:35] <max_kolonko> 42 is never a bad joke
[18:30] <jezza_mcwaffle> @ccp_larrikin: With the FAX and their skins would it be possibly to transfer over skins people bought for carriers onto the FAX's
[18:31] <ccp_larrikin> @jezza_mcwaffle: I'm not sure, I'll chat to the people involved.
[18:32] <jezza_mcwaffle> Thank you :simple_smile: I realised it was something we never brought up before
[19:29] <jezza_mcwaffle> Chance brought up the point of WH rolling yachts. CCP Fozzie said it should be
[19:29] <jezza_mcwaffle> easy enough to fix. At a later session after giving the issue a bit more thought, CCP
[19:29] <jezza_mcwaffle> Fozzie floated the idea of adding a role penalty to the Yacht that fully disabled all
[19:29] <jezza_mcwaffle> effects of Higgs Anchor rigs on that specific ship.
[20:21] <rocket_x> "As a general rule: if the same thing is represented twice in redundant manner, you can either just remove one representation or it is a sign that one of the representations is not good enough"
[20:21] <rocket_x> a dude pm'd this to me on tweetfleet
[20:21] <scott_ormands> im definitely only going to use the right click options
[20:21] <rocket_x> and tbh i kinda agree
[21:59] <scott_ormands> hey rocket
[21:59] <scott_ormands> come shoot goon supers on sisi with us